{"id":1501,"date":"2020-02-14T18:40:45","date_gmt":"2020-02-14T17:40:45","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/johan-callewaert.eu\/?p=1501"},"modified":"2020-02-14T18:40:45","modified_gmt":"2020-02-14T17:40:45","slug":"judgment-of-the-echr-in-the-case-of-sanofi-pasteur-v-france","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/johan-callewaert.eu\/fr\/judgment-of-the-echr-in-the-case-of-sanofi-pasteur-v-france\/","title":{"rendered":"Judgment of the ECHR in the case of Sanofi Pasteur v. France"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p> In the case of\u00a0<strong>Sanofi Pasteur v. France<\/strong>\u00a0(13.2.2020) the ECHR recapitulated its case-law on the need for domestic courts which, under Article 267 TFEU, are in principle obliged to make a\u00a0<strong>reference to the CJEU for a preliminary ruling<\/strong>, to\u00a0<strong>give reasons\u00a0<\/strong>when they reject an application to that effect by one of the parties to the proceedings. In the present case, it found that the French Court of cassation had breached Article 6 of the Convention by limiting its reasoning to finding that there was no need to call the CJEU. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-file\"><a href=\"https:\/\/johan-callewaert.eu\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/02\/AFFAIRE-SANOFI-PASTEUR-c.-FRANCE.pdf\">AFFAIRE-SANOFI-PASTEUR-c.-FRANCE<\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/johan-callewaert.eu\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/02\/AFFAIRE-SANOFI-PASTEUR-c.-FRANCE.pdf\" class=\"wp-block-file__button\" download>Download PDF (French only)<\/a><\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In the case of\u00a0Sanofi Pasteur v. France\u00a0(13.2.2020) the ECHR recapitulated its case-law on the need for domestic courts which, under Article 267 TFEU, are in principle obliged to make a\u00a0reference to the CJEU for a preliminary ruling, to\u00a0give reasons\u00a0when they reject an application to that effect by one of the parties to the proceedings. In [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[22,19],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1501","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-european-court-of-human-rights","category-recent-case-law"],"translation":{"provider":"WPGlobus","version":"3.0.2","language":"fr","enabled_languages":["en","de","fr"],"languages":{"en":{"title":true,"content":true,"excerpt":false},"de":{"title":false,"content":false,"excerpt":false},"fr":{"title":false,"content":false,"excerpt":false}}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/johan-callewaert.eu\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1501","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/johan-callewaert.eu\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/johan-callewaert.eu\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/johan-callewaert.eu\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/johan-callewaert.eu\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1501"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/johan-callewaert.eu\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1501\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1502,"href":"https:\/\/johan-callewaert.eu\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1501\/revisions\/1502"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/johan-callewaert.eu\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1501"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/johan-callewaert.eu\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1501"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/johan-callewaert.eu\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1501"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}